Skip to content
Bruce Friedman MediationBruce Friedman Mediation
Bruce Friedman Mediation
Mediation and Arbitration in Los Angeles
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact

California Heightens Doctrine of Mediation Confidentiality

Mar22012
Mediation

Hopefully most California mediators are well-versed in case law surrounding their practice, but are a majority of the lawyers who rely on these neutrals aware of the doctrine of mediation confidentiality as it relates to potential malpractice suits? Recently, a unanimous decision at the state Supreme Court raised California’s doctrine of mediation confidentiality to a higher level. In Cassel v. Superior Court (51 Cal. 4th 113 (2011)), the California court held that a malpractice plaintiff cannot rely on statements counsel made during mediation to prove an attorney’s liability for allegedly faulty advice.

military pay per day 3.65

Thanks to the 2011 ruling, mediation participants are assured that California courts will strictly apply the confidentiality rules. A skilled mediator understand how to encourage an open dialogue, while also limiting unnecessary or potentially harmful exchange.  According to the California court’s opinion, clients and their lawyers can continue to speak freely in mediation, even during private caucuses, confident that what they say will not be cited back to them as evidence in a later proceeding.

The ruling has sparked a lively debate within the legal community.  Some mediators feel that the decision creates immunity for lawyers who don’t deserve it — lawyers who commit malpractice against their clients.  However, others point to the fact that either way, to show malpractice, the client must prove a case within a case to establish liability, which requires more than just statements made during the mediation.

What are your thoughts on the matter?

Bruce A. Friedman is a mediator with a national practice. With years of litigation experience behind him, he understands the goals of the mediation process and will do his best to ensure that the needs of both parties are met, justly and efficiently.  For more information on the mediation services that Bruce A. Friedman provides, check out his website at http://www.FriedmanMediation.com or call him at (310) 201-0010.


Category: MediationBy bfriedmanMarch 2, 2012
Tags: californiacase lawmediationmediator

Author: bfriedman

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Preparing Your Client for MediationNextNext post:Court Orders Man to Apologize on Facebook

Related posts

Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
March 24, 2016
As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
May 8, 2015
Bruce Friedman: Guest Host on Conflicts Specialists Show
February 5, 2014
Impasse — A Mediator’s Opportunity
December 18, 2013
Bruce A. Friedman Named as ‘Rising Star’ Among the ‘Top 50 Neutrals in California’ by the Daily Journal
October 17, 2013
On the Radio with Bruce Friedman
September 23, 2013
Blog Categories
  • Benefits of Mediation(2)
  • Bruce's Corner(30)
  • Honors(1)
  • Mediation(39)
  • Publications(5)
Recent Posts
  • Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
    March 24, 2016
  • As Featured on Law360: Shepherding Insurers Through The Mediation Process
    October 9, 2015
  • Featured on Law.com: Impasse-Busting Techniques – Part 2
    September 10, 2015
  • As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
    May 8, 2015
Testimonials
  • [Bruce] knows when to talk, when to listen, and how to work the room.”

    James Thompson
    JPT Legal
  • Bruce took time to point out parts of each side’s case that could be made stronger and parts that could be deemphasized or omitted. Bottom line: the client came out of the exercise with a more focused case and better able to advance its positions. Bruce was superb.

    Ellis Mirsky
    The Network of Trial Lawyers
  • Bruce was prepared and understood the issues and the practical aspects of the cases. I really appreciated Bruce’s efforts in continuing to work with me and opposing counsel and his perseverance in settling the case.

    Frederick S. Reisz
    Meyers McConnell
  • I have known Bruce for years and highly recommend him. As a native New Yorker, he will be hearing significant matters in NYC as well as in L.A.

    Jeffrey Kravtiz
    Fox Rothschild
  • Bruce’s willingness to continue to follow up with both sides to settle the matter and his efforts in speaking directly with the clients to explain the issues and possible outcomes should the case proceed to trial were invaluable.

    P. Garrell
    Liner Law Firm
  • From the outset of the mediation, it was clear that Bruce understood the case and structure of a class action settlement. He was effective in his discussion of the issues in the case and made many helpful and constructive suggestions with respect to the negotiating process and the settlement terms.

    Tim Blood
    Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP
Resources
linked in for bruce friedman attorney los angeles mediation services
Los Angeles Office

555 West Fifth Street
(Gas Company Tower)
32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
T: (800) 352-JAMS

View Map & Directions

Century City Office

JAMS Services
The Watt Plaza
1925 Century Park E
Los Angeles, CA  90067 
310-392-3044

View Map & Directions

 

©2018 Bruce A. Friedman. All Rights Reserved
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Web Design by WebPresenceesq.com
Privacy