Skip to content
Bruce Friedman MediationBruce Friedman Mediation
Bruce Friedman Mediation
Mediation and Arbitration in Los Angeles
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact

CA Court of Appeal Rules on Arbitrator Disclosure

Aug282012
Bruce's Corner
Recently, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, ruled that an arbitrator in a legal malpractice/attorneys fee dispute did not violate the disclosure requirements in the California Arbitration Act when his disclosure statement did not disclose the following:
  • That he [the arbitrator] was a member of the Los Angeles County Bar Association Appellate Executive Committee with a member of the defendant law firm;
  • Loans Direct Lender
  • That he [the arbitrator] and the law firm’s expert witness had appeared together as panelists in continuing education programs and were members of the Board of Governors of the ABTL;
  • That he [the arbitrator] had once practiced at a law firm that had defended lawyers in legal malpractice actions; and
  • That members of the defendant law firm had appeared before him when he was a judge.

Disclosure of the foregoing items was not called for in the disclosure statement completed by the arbitrator.  The Court of Appeal found that none of the so called “non-disclosures” provided a credible basis for inferring an impression of bias and as such did not violate the disclosure requirements of the California Arbitration Act. The Court affirmed the denial of the petition to set aside the arbitration award for non-disclosure. Nemecek & Cole v. Steven J. Horn, California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, July 23, 2012, 2012 DJDAR 11353.

This is a very narrow reading of the Arbitration Act and the Judicial Council rules and it is very protective of the arbitrator.  The ethics standard adopted by the Judicial Council requires disclosure of anything that could cause a person aware of the facts to reasonably entertain a doubt that the arbitrator would be able to be impartial.  The arbitrator’s early professional affiliation with a law firm that did legal malpractice defense and the fact that lawyers from the defendant law firm appeared in front of him when he was a judge cIearly fall outside the statutory disclosure requirements and the rules.  It is a closer call, however, with respect to the affiliations with a partner in the defendant law firm and the expert witness on the boards of professional associations.

I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on the decision and on the subject of disclosure.

–Bruce

Bruce A. Friedman is a mediator with a national practice. With years of litigation experience behind him, he understands the goals of the mediation process and will do his best to ensure that the needs of both parties are met, justly and efficiently. For more information on the mediation services that Bruce A. Friedman provides, check out his website at http://www.FriedmanMediation.com, his profile at ADRServices.org, or call him at (310) 201-0010.

Category: Bruce's CornerBy bfriedmanAugust 28, 2012
Tags: arbitrationcase lawlegal malpratice

Author: bfriedman

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:When is a Mediator’s Proposal Appropriate?NextNext post:Named to Central District of CA Mediation Panel

Related posts

As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
May 8, 2015
The Biology of Decision-Making
June 18, 2014
The Antidote to the Spiteful Litigant
May 7, 2014
The Mediator’s Proposal: The Ultimate Impasse Buster
January 21, 2014
Negotiation with the Mediator – Another Impasse Buster for Your Consideration
January 14, 2014
Ranges and Brackets — Impasse Busting Techniques for Your Consideration
January 6, 2014
Blog Categories
  • Benefits of Mediation(2)
  • Bruce's Corner(30)
  • Honors(1)
  • Mediation(39)
  • Publications(5)
Recent Posts
  • Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
    March 24, 2016
  • As Featured on Law360: Shepherding Insurers Through The Mediation Process
    October 9, 2015
  • Featured on Law.com: Impasse-Busting Techniques – Part 2
    September 10, 2015
  • As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
    May 8, 2015
Testimonials
  • [Bruce] knows when to talk, when to listen, and how to work the room.”

    James Thompson
    JPT Legal
  • Bruce took time to point out parts of each side’s case that could be made stronger and parts that could be deemphasized or omitted. Bottom line: the client came out of the exercise with a more focused case and better able to advance its positions. Bruce was superb.

    Ellis Mirsky
    The Network of Trial Lawyers
  • Bruce was prepared and understood the issues and the practical aspects of the cases. I really appreciated Bruce’s efforts in continuing to work with me and opposing counsel and his perseverance in settling the case.

    Frederick S. Reisz
    Meyers McConnell
  • I have known Bruce for years and highly recommend him. As a native New Yorker, he will be hearing significant matters in NYC as well as in L.A.

    Jeffrey Kravtiz
    Fox Rothschild
  • Bruce’s willingness to continue to follow up with both sides to settle the matter and his efforts in speaking directly with the clients to explain the issues and possible outcomes should the case proceed to trial were invaluable.

    P. Garrell
    Liner Law Firm
  • From the outset of the mediation, it was clear that Bruce understood the case and structure of a class action settlement. He was effective in his discussion of the issues in the case and made many helpful and constructive suggestions with respect to the negotiating process and the settlement terms.

    Tim Blood
    Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP
Resources
linked in for bruce friedman attorney los angeles mediation services
Los Angeles Office

555 West Fifth Street
(Gas Company Tower)
32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
T: (800) 352-JAMS

View Map & Directions

Century City Office

JAMS Services
The Watt Plaza
1925 Century Park E
Los Angeles, CA  90067 
310-392-3044

View Map & Directions

 

©2018 Bruce A. Friedman. All Rights Reserved
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Web Design by WebPresenceesq.com
Privacy