Skip to content
Bruce Friedman MediationBruce Friedman Mediation
Bruce Friedman Mediation
Mediation and Arbitration in Los Angeles
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact

When is a Mediator’s Proposal Appropriate?

Oct122012
Bruce's CornerMediation
Often times toward the end of a day of mediation, when it looks like the parties cannot come to an agreement on the terms of a settlement, a party may request a mediator’s proposal or the mediator may suggest it.  A mediator’s proposal is the mediators recommendation to both sides of the terms on which the case should be settled. Each side then has a period of time (usually a day to a week) to accept or reject it.
 
In my view, the mediator’s proposal is overused and abused.  It is not an appropriate settlement technique in most cases, yet it is used too often out of frustration at the conclusion of an unsuccessful mediation. When is a mediator’s proposal appropriate?  First, a mediator should only make a proposal when all sides of the case request one or give their consent to the mediator making one.  An experienced mediator should not impose his/her terms on the parties without their consent.  Second, unless the parties are in a range within in which the case can be settled, a mediator should refrain from making a proposal even if the parties want one.
To put it in more positive terms, a mediator’s proposal should be made only if the mediator believes that it has a reasonable likelihood of acceptance. The reason is that a mediation is a facilitative process with case evaluation to be used as a tool to bring the parties together.  Mediation is not, nor should it be,a decision making process where the mediator decides who should win and how much should be paid. Moreover, a mediator’s proposal takes on a life of its own in a case.  If it is not accepted, counsel on one side or the other will say that the mediator thought the case should be settled at the amount of the proposal. As a result, an unaccepted proposal may hinder further settlement negotiations rather than help them and violate the do no harm principle of an unsuccessful mediation.
If the mediator’s proposal is appropriate, the proposal should represent the mediator’s belief as to the acceptable terms of a settlement to both sides.  It should be the maximum amount the mediator believes that the defendant will pay and the minimum amount that the plaintiff will accept after having exhausted every opportunity to have the parties reach a settlement on their own.  The proposal should not be what the mediator believes the case is worth or what a decision maker, judge or jury, might decide.  A mediator’s job is to facilitate settlement, not decide the merits of the dispute.
–Bruce
Bruce A. Friedman is a mediator with a national practice. With years of litigation experience behind him, he understands the goals of the mediation process and will do his best to ensure that the needs of both parties are met, justly and efficiently. For more information on the mediation services that Bruce A. Friedman provides, check out his website at http://www.FriedmanMediation.com, his profile at ADRServices.org, or call him at (310) 201-0010.
Category: Bruce's Corner, MediationBy bfriedmanOctober 12, 2012
Tags: mediationmediator

Author: bfriedman

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Binding Mediation, An OxymoronNextNext post:CA Court of Appeal Rules on Arbitrator Disclosure

Related posts

Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
March 24, 2016
As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
May 8, 2015
The Biology of Decision-Making
June 18, 2014
The Antidote to the Spiteful Litigant
May 7, 2014
Bruce Friedman: Guest Host on Conflicts Specialists Show
February 5, 2014
The Mediator’s Proposal: The Ultimate Impasse Buster
January 21, 2014
Blog Categories
  • Benefits of Mediation(2)
  • Bruce's Corner(30)
  • Honors(1)
  • Mediation(39)
  • Publications(5)
Recent Posts
  • Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
    March 24, 2016
  • As Featured on Law360: Shepherding Insurers Through The Mediation Process
    October 9, 2015
  • Featured on Law.com: Impasse-Busting Techniques – Part 2
    September 10, 2015
  • As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
    May 8, 2015
Testimonials
  • [Bruce] knows when to talk, when to listen, and how to work the room.”

    James Thompson
    JPT Legal
  • Bruce took time to point out parts of each side’s case that could be made stronger and parts that could be deemphasized or omitted. Bottom line: the client came out of the exercise with a more focused case and better able to advance its positions. Bruce was superb.

    Ellis Mirsky
    The Network of Trial Lawyers
  • Bruce was prepared and understood the issues and the practical aspects of the cases. I really appreciated Bruce’s efforts in continuing to work with me and opposing counsel and his perseverance in settling the case.

    Frederick S. Reisz
    Meyers McConnell
  • I have known Bruce for years and highly recommend him. As a native New Yorker, he will be hearing significant matters in NYC as well as in L.A.

    Jeffrey Kravtiz
    Fox Rothschild
  • Bruce’s willingness to continue to follow up with both sides to settle the matter and his efforts in speaking directly with the clients to explain the issues and possible outcomes should the case proceed to trial were invaluable.

    P. Garrell
    Liner Law Firm
  • From the outset of the mediation, it was clear that Bruce understood the case and structure of a class action settlement. He was effective in his discussion of the issues in the case and made many helpful and constructive suggestions with respect to the negotiating process and the settlement terms.

    Tim Blood
    Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP
Resources
linked in for bruce friedman attorney los angeles mediation services
Los Angeles Office

555 West Fifth Street
(Gas Company Tower)
32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
T: (800) 352-JAMS

View Map & Directions

Century City Office

JAMS Services
The Watt Plaza
1925 Century Park E
Los Angeles, CA  90067 
310-392-3044

View Map & Directions

 

©2018 Bruce A. Friedman. All Rights Reserved
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Web Design by WebPresenceesq.com
Privacy