Skip to content
Bruce Friedman MediationBruce Friedman Mediation
Bruce Friedman Mediation
Mediation and Arbitration in Los Angeles
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact

The Mediator’s Proposal: The Ultimate Impasse Buster

Jan212014
Bruce's Corner

The end of the day is nearing and the mediation has ground to a halt.  The parties have narrowed the gap between them, but cannot close it.  Is it time to suggest a mediator’s  proposal?  Does a proposed settlement amount coming from the mediator have a reasonable likelihood of acceptance?  Are the parties interested in having the mediator make a proposal?  If the answer to these questions is yes, then it is time to employ the ultimate impasse busting technique, the mediator’s proposal.

But what amount should the mediator propose?  Splitting the difference between the last demand and offer has undoubtedly been discussed with the parties and rejected.  Otherwise, a mediator’s proposal would not be necessary.  How does the mediator avoid the appearance of favoring one side over the other when the contemplated mediator’s proposal is closer to one party’s last position than the other’s?  Should the mediator have a reasonable degree of confidence that the plaintiff will accept the proposed amount?Should the mediator have a reasonable degree of confidence that the defendant will pay the proposed amount?   Is one of these factors more important than the other?

 

There are no definitive answers to these questions, each mediation presents different considerations in fashioning the proposal.  The questions only serve to provide a series of issues that a mediator should consider in making the proposal.  In the end, the mediator’s gut feeling of what to propose is probably the best source for choosing the right amount to propose.  The proposed number should be one that the mediator believes will be accepted, and not one that reflects the mediator’s evaluation of the merits of the case.  The parties have already negotiated a range of how they value the case.  The mediator’s  proposal should reflect the parties negotiated valuation, not the mediator’s opinion based on a merits based evaluation.

Another consideration is how long the mediator’s proposal should remain open for consideration and acceptance.  What have the parties said on the subject?  Should it only be available until the end of the mediation session?  A day?  A week?  Again, the circumstances of each mediation will dictate the answer.  If all the decision-makers are present with the authority to settle the case, then perhaps the proposal should remain open only until the end of the mediation itself.  Striking while the iron is hot is an important aspect of the mediation session.  Does one party or the other need to discuss the mediator’s proposal with their supervisor or claims committee?  Is a cooling off period a good idea in terms of allowing emotion to subside and rational thought to prevail.  Again, these are only some of the many factors to be considered in connection with suggesting how long the proposal should be available for acceptance or rejection.

The mediator’s proposal is the most powerful impasse busting technique.  It should be used with care and caution as it is likely to have a lasting effect on the dispute if it is not accepted.

—

Bruce A. Friedman, Esq. is a mediator and arbitrator with a national practice. View his website or his bio on ADR Services.
Category: Bruce's CornerBy bfriedmanJanuary 21, 2014
Tags: californiamediationmediator

Author: bfriedman

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Bruce Friedman: Guest Host on Conflicts Specialists ShowNextNext post:Negotiation with the Mediator – Another Impasse Buster for Your Consideration

Related posts

As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
May 8, 2015
The Biology of Decision-Making
June 18, 2014
The Antidote to the Spiteful Litigant
May 7, 2014
Negotiation with the Mediator – Another Impasse Buster for Your Consideration
January 14, 2014
Ranges and Brackets — Impasse Busting Techniques for Your Consideration
January 6, 2014
Impasse — A Mediator’s Opportunity
December 18, 2013
Blog Categories
  • Benefits of Mediation(2)
  • Bruce's Corner(30)
  • Honors(1)
  • Mediation(39)
  • Publications(5)
Recent Posts
  • Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
    March 24, 2016
  • As Featured on Law360: Shepherding Insurers Through The Mediation Process
    October 9, 2015
  • Featured on Law.com: Impasse-Busting Techniques – Part 2
    September 10, 2015
  • As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
    May 8, 2015
Testimonials
  • [Bruce] knows when to talk, when to listen, and how to work the room.”

    James Thompson
    JPT Legal
  • Bruce took time to point out parts of each side’s case that could be made stronger and parts that could be deemphasized or omitted. Bottom line: the client came out of the exercise with a more focused case and better able to advance its positions. Bruce was superb.

    Ellis Mirsky
    The Network of Trial Lawyers
  • Bruce was prepared and understood the issues and the practical aspects of the cases. I really appreciated Bruce’s efforts in continuing to work with me and opposing counsel and his perseverance in settling the case.

    Frederick S. Reisz
    Meyers McConnell
  • I have known Bruce for years and highly recommend him. As a native New Yorker, he will be hearing significant matters in NYC as well as in L.A.

    Jeffrey Kravtiz
    Fox Rothschild
  • Bruce’s willingness to continue to follow up with both sides to settle the matter and his efforts in speaking directly with the clients to explain the issues and possible outcomes should the case proceed to trial were invaluable.

    P. Garrell
    Liner Law Firm
  • From the outset of the mediation, it was clear that Bruce understood the case and structure of a class action settlement. He was effective in his discussion of the issues in the case and made many helpful and constructive suggestions with respect to the negotiating process and the settlement terms.

    Tim Blood
    Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP
Resources
linked in for bruce friedman attorney los angeles mediation services
Los Angeles Office

555 West Fifth Street
(Gas Company Tower)
32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
T: (800) 352-JAMS

View Map & Directions

Century City Office

JAMS Services
The Watt Plaza
1925 Century Park E
Los Angeles, CA  90067 
310-392-3044

View Map & Directions

 

©2018 Bruce A. Friedman. All Rights Reserved
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Web Design by WebPresenceesq.com
Privacy