Skip to content
Bruce Friedman MediationBruce Friedman Mediation
Bruce Friedman Mediation
Mediation and Arbitration in Los Angeles
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact

Negotiation with the Mediator – Another Impasse Buster for Your Consideration

Jan142014
Bruce's Corner
You have reviewed and analyzed the mediation briefs and the parties have disclosed prior settlement negotiations and where they would like to end up at the conclusion of the mediation; or the parties disclose to you during the course of early caucus meetings what they would accept or pay in settlement.  Often, their goals are simply not in the same ballpark and a traditional negotiation, a series of demands and offers may not be the most productive way to proceed.  In fact, it may be a very counterproductive method of trying to resolve the case.What about having the parties negotiate with the mediator instead of one another?  Instead of carrying a non-starter demand or offer to the other side, why not tell the plaintiff that based on your discussions with defendants, the amount that they are seeking is not in the range that defendants will pay.  Of course, this can only happen after you have had a discussion with the defendants so that you can confidently make such a statement.  The discussion will then turn to why the plaintiff’s contemplated demand is too high in an effort to get the plaintiff to give the mediator a more realistic figure.  The same discussion then occurs with the defendant as to why their contemplated bottom line is not realistic and does not properly assess the risk of loss.

hard money loan

These discussions may lead to the mediator asking the counsel and party to give the mediator their bottom line to be kept confidential from the other side who will have a similar discussion with the mediator as to their bottom line.  Parties rarely give the mediator the real bottom line which can only be tested when there is a realistic prospect of settlement, but this technique is useful in narrowing the gap between the parties without engaging in what is a prolonged and often contentious negotiation in which plaintiff’s counsel will undoubtedly say that the defendant does not  respect me and our case and defense counsel says that the plaintiff is not being realistic about the liability and/or damages issues.

Using this negotiation with the mediator methodology may result in the mediator negotiating with the parties all the way to the point where they separately agree on a settlement number and the mediator can announce that they have settled.  Other times, the method will narrow the gap enough to start a negotiation in the zone of agreement in an effort to reach a settlement.  Either way, this approach to negotiation can serve as an impasse buster without alienating the parties to the suit.   It is not an appropriate method for all mediations, but one to be considered under circumstances where the  parties are too far apart to engage in a meaningful negotiation and a traditional negotiation between the parties is likely to create an insurmountable impasse early on in the mediation.

 Bruce A. Friedman, Esq. is a mediator and arbitrator with a national practice. View his website or his bio on ADR Services.
Category: Bruce's CornerBy bfriedmanJanuary 14, 2014
Tags: californiamediationmediation tips

Author: bfriedman

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:The Mediator’s Proposal: The Ultimate Impasse BusterNextNext post:Ranges and Brackets — Impasse Busting Techniques for Your Consideration

Related posts

As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
May 8, 2015
The Biology of Decision-Making
June 18, 2014
The Antidote to the Spiteful Litigant
May 7, 2014
The Mediator’s Proposal: The Ultimate Impasse Buster
January 21, 2014
Ranges and Brackets — Impasse Busting Techniques for Your Consideration
January 6, 2014
Impasse — A Mediator’s Opportunity
December 18, 2013
Blog Categories
  • Benefits of Mediation(2)
  • Bruce's Corner(30)
  • Honors(1)
  • Mediation(39)
  • Publications(5)
Recent Posts
  • Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
    March 24, 2016
  • As Featured on Law360: Shepherding Insurers Through The Mediation Process
    October 9, 2015
  • Featured on Law.com: Impasse-Busting Techniques – Part 2
    September 10, 2015
  • As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
    May 8, 2015
Testimonials
  • [Bruce] knows when to talk, when to listen, and how to work the room.”

    James Thompson
    JPT Legal
  • Bruce took time to point out parts of each side’s case that could be made stronger and parts that could be deemphasized or omitted. Bottom line: the client came out of the exercise with a more focused case and better able to advance its positions. Bruce was superb.

    Ellis Mirsky
    The Network of Trial Lawyers
  • Bruce was prepared and understood the issues and the practical aspects of the cases. I really appreciated Bruce’s efforts in continuing to work with me and opposing counsel and his perseverance in settling the case.

    Frederick S. Reisz
    Meyers McConnell
  • I have known Bruce for years and highly recommend him. As a native New Yorker, he will be hearing significant matters in NYC as well as in L.A.

    Jeffrey Kravtiz
    Fox Rothschild
  • Bruce’s willingness to continue to follow up with both sides to settle the matter and his efforts in speaking directly with the clients to explain the issues and possible outcomes should the case proceed to trial were invaluable.

    P. Garrell
    Liner Law Firm
  • From the outset of the mediation, it was clear that Bruce understood the case and structure of a class action settlement. He was effective in his discussion of the issues in the case and made many helpful and constructive suggestions with respect to the negotiating process and the settlement terms.

    Tim Blood
    Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP
Resources
linked in for bruce friedman attorney los angeles mediation services
Los Angeles Office

555 West Fifth Street
(Gas Company Tower)
32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
T: (800) 352-JAMS

View Map & Directions

Century City Office

JAMS Services
The Watt Plaza
1925 Century Park E
Los Angeles, CA  90067 
310-392-3044

View Map & Directions

 

©2018 Bruce A. Friedman. All Rights Reserved
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Web Design by WebPresenceesq.com
Privacy