Skip to content
Bruce Friedman MediationBruce Friedman Mediation
Bruce Friedman Mediation
Mediation and Arbitration in Los Angeles
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Litigation Experience
    • Mediation & Arbitration Case Summaries
  • Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Mediation Services
  • Testimonials
  • News & Blog
  • Contact

Thoughts On The Initial Demand

In an informal survey of mediators, I have found that our collective experience is universal –the initial demand is extraordinarily high, bears no relationship whatsoever to the verdict potential of the case and is usually counterproductive to the mediation process.  Since the initial demand is usually made only after lengthy discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case and the range of recoverable damages, it is even more perplexing that it bears no relationship to the recoverable damages in the case.

So why is it that the initial demand is so extraordinarily high?  One reason is to satisfy the client’s lottery mentality (that going to trial is like buying a ticket to a lottery) that the plaintiff will always win without regard to the millions to one odds in play in the lottery.  A second reason is the fear of leaving money on the table.  A third is to give the plaintiff’s counsel more room to negotiate the maximum settlement amount.

In my view, these are all false premises and counterproductive to settlement of the case.  As counsel, part of preparing for a mediation is preparing your client for an objective discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case and the likely range of damages.  Ideally, that discussion leads to a negotiating strategy that begins with a demand above the high damage range (perhaps in the 2 or 3 times the recoverable damages), but not the 5 to 10 or more times that a jury could ever award and withstand a motion for new trial we often see.

As to the fear of leaving money on the table, that fear will not be alleviated by an unrealistic demand.  The standard defense response is a proportionately low offer; rendering the first few rounds of negotiation a waste of everyone’s time.  After all, defendants will not engage in good faith negotiations until the demand is in a good faith range of the recoverable damages in the case, even if the demand is at the high end of that range.

In terms of giving the plaintiff room to negotiate, the typical pattern of mediation demand and offer is the pie in the sky demand falling precipitously as the defendant makes incremental increases in the offer.  However, what many attorneys fail to see is that here is plenty room to negotiate starting with a more reasonably based demand and a party can always stop at or above the bottom line.

From a mediator’s perspective, the tip is to get your client on board with a high, but not ludicrous demand that bears some semblance to the recoverable damage in the case.  Don’t worry, the defendants will never pay that number, but will welcome the opportunity to initiate meaningful negotiations much earlier than at the very end of the mediation day.

financial loans

— Bruce

these options youre
deciding which bills
Bruce A. Friedman is a mediator and arbitrator with an international practice. With years of litigation experience behind him, he understands the goals of the mediation process and will do his best to ensure that the needs of both parties are met, justly and efficiently. For more information on the mediation services that Bruce A. Friedman provides, check out his website at http://www.FriedmanMediation.com, his profile at ADRServices.org, or call him at (310) 201-0010.

 

 

 

Category: Bruce's Corner, MediationBy bfriedmanAugust 9, 2013
Tags: mediation

Author: bfriedman

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Online Mediation — Press DeleteNextNext post:The Ethical Neutral: What Must Be Disclosed In Mediation (via Law360)

Related posts

Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
March 24, 2016
As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
May 8, 2015
The Biology of Decision-Making
June 18, 2014
The Antidote to the Spiteful Litigant
May 7, 2014
Bruce Friedman: Guest Host on Conflicts Specialists Show
February 5, 2014
The Mediator’s Proposal: The Ultimate Impasse Buster
January 21, 2014
Blog Categories
  • Benefits of Mediation(2)
  • Bruce's Corner(30)
  • Honors(1)
  • Mediation(39)
  • Publications(5)
Recent Posts
  • Bruce Friedman Discusses the Early Mediation of Insurance Coverage Cases on Law.com
    March 24, 2016
  • As Featured on Law360: Shepherding Insurers Through The Mediation Process
    October 9, 2015
  • Featured on Law.com: Impasse-Busting Techniques – Part 2
    September 10, 2015
  • As Featured on Law.com: Effective Impasse Busting Techniques
    May 8, 2015
Testimonials
  • [Bruce] knows when to talk, when to listen, and how to work the room.”

    James Thompson
    JPT Legal
  • Bruce took time to point out parts of each side’s case that could be made stronger and parts that could be deemphasized or omitted. Bottom line: the client came out of the exercise with a more focused case and better able to advance its positions. Bruce was superb.

    Ellis Mirsky
    The Network of Trial Lawyers
  • Bruce was prepared and understood the issues and the practical aspects of the cases. I really appreciated Bruce’s efforts in continuing to work with me and opposing counsel and his perseverance in settling the case.

    Frederick S. Reisz
    Meyers McConnell
  • I have known Bruce for years and highly recommend him. As a native New Yorker, he will be hearing significant matters in NYC as well as in L.A.

    Jeffrey Kravtiz
    Fox Rothschild
  • Bruce’s willingness to continue to follow up with both sides to settle the matter and his efforts in speaking directly with the clients to explain the issues and possible outcomes should the case proceed to trial were invaluable.

    P. Garrell
    Liner Law Firm
  • From the outset of the mediation, it was clear that Bruce understood the case and structure of a class action settlement. He was effective in his discussion of the issues in the case and made many helpful and constructive suggestions with respect to the negotiating process and the settlement terms.

    Tim Blood
    Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP
Resources
linked in for bruce friedman attorney los angeles mediation services
Los Angeles Office

555 West Fifth Street
(Gas Company Tower)
32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
T: (800) 352-JAMS

View Map & Directions

Century City Office

JAMS Services
The Watt Plaza
1925 Century Park E
Los Angeles, CA  90067 
310-392-3044

View Map & Directions

 

©2018 Bruce A. Friedman. All Rights Reserved
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Web Design by WebPresenceesq.com
Privacy